![](alonzo.jpg) |
|
The
following guest essays provide ideas and insight into the issues and processes
of developing a public art initiative. The contributors share history,
tips and best practices gathered from their long, successful careers in
public arts programing and implementation. Their experience encompasses
university, city, and state level projects. These writings are designed
to give a deeper understanding into the complexities and layers of public
art by practitioners with diverse and varied expertise.
>
The Aims of Public Art
Regina M. Flanagan
is a public art administrator, photographer and graduate landscape architect.
She has seventeen years experience directing public art programs and projects,
and has written numerous feature articles and opinion pieces for the Public
Art Review. Recently, she authored the Public Art Framework and Field
Guide for Madison, Wisconsin with The Placemaking Collaborative, Saint
Paul, Minnesota. The public art featured with this essay was commissioned
during Flanagan's tenure (1988-1998) as director of the Minnesota Percent
for Art in Public Places program. Her essay provides a context for public
arts projects and suggested approaches for successful implementation.
"Through the
late nineteenth-century, public art was routinely part of American civic
buildings and places. Using the models of ancient Greece and Rome, monuments
as well as architectural ornament including carved friezes and statuary,
depicted historic events and people. Principles like justice, liberty
and equality were often abstractly personified in this art, which intended
to portray America's civic values and ideals..."
>
Public Art, Artist and Content
David Allen
is a public art administrator currently managing public art installation
and selection of the Minneapolis Hiawatha light-rail project. This light-rail
corridor has several stations which will incorporate public arts projects
with artists at many different stages of design and construction. Mr.
Allen came to Minneapolis after a very successful 13 year term as the
public arts administrator for San Jose, CA.
"There are
currently over two hundred and fifty public art programs in existence
in this country. The majority are structured after the "percent
for art" model that originated in Philadelphia in the late 1950s.
However, there are numerous other funding and administrative formats
employed by cities, counties, states, transit agencies, colleges, and
universities.
The practice of
public art and its administration is anything but a mutually accepted
discipline with recognized standards. It is a very broad field that
has evolved and expanded in a rather free-for-all manner. One of the
benefits of this lack of structure is that it has lead to a continuing
reinterpretation of how artists work in our built world. This work has
been labeled, often in hindsight, with a number of descriptive terms:
stand alone, art in public places, site specific, site responsive, site
generated, integrated, community based, civic, art and design, and new
genre. If nothing else, the sheer number of terms is evidence that a
lot has gone on in this field, and more will come..."
![](fp.gif) |
|